Đề ôn thi Đề thi vào lớp 10 Trường THPT Chuyên KHXH môn Tiếng Anh - Mã đề KHXH-165

The International Space Station (ISS) is a remarkable achievement of engineering. Orbiting our planet at thousands of kilometers per hour, it is one of the (35) __________ structures ever built by humans. As a home and laboratory in space, it requires a constant and reliable source of electricity to power its life support systems and scientific equipment. But how does it get this energy so far from Earth?

The key to its power is its massive set of solar arrays. These giant, wing-like panels are covered in thousands of solar cells. As the ISS orbits the Earth, these arrays are positioned to face the sun, where they (36) __________ collect energy from sunlight. This process, known as photovoltaics, converts light directly into electricity. The size of these arrays is truly impressive, covering an area as large as a football field.

The ISS isn't always in direct sunlight; it passes through Earth's shadow for about 35 minutes of every 90-minute orbit. During these periods, the station (37) __________ rely on huge, rechargeable batteries. These batteries store the excess energy collected during the sunlit part of the orbit. (38) __________ ensures that the astronauts and systems on board have an uninterrupted power supply, 24 hours a day.

The electricity provided is crucial. This energy is essential for the astronauts on board, allowing them to (39) __________ important research that is only possible in a microgravity environment. They study everything from human biology to (40) __________ materials. The power also runs the computers, communication systems, and all the machinery that keeps the crew safe and healthy.

(41) __________ does this system power the station, but it also serves as a brilliant example of renewable energy in action. It demonstrates how we can harness the power of the sun to sustain complex operations far from our home planet. (42) __________, the ISS is a self-sufficient outpost in space, thanks to its clever and continuous use of solar power.

Imagine this: a new blockbuster is out, and you’re deciding whether to see it. You open a movie app and see two very different numbers. One is the 'Tomatometer' score from professional critics, and the other is the 'Audience Score' from regular moviegoers. Often, these scores tell conflicting stories. This modern dilemma—whether to trust the experts or the crowd—is something every movie fan faces, especially on popular platforms like Rotten Tomatoes and IMDb.

Professional film critics are experts who have dedicated their lives to studying cinema. They possess deep knowledge of film history, narrative structure, and the technical aspects of filmmaking, like cinematography and sound design. Their job is to provide a detailed and objective analysis. They evaluate a film based on its artistic merit, the complexity of its themes, and its contribution to the art form. When a critic gives a film a high score, they are often appreciating its sophisticated storytelling or innovative directing, even if the film might not be simple entertainment.

On the other side of the screen are audience scores. These represent the collective voice of the public. Unlike critics, most audience members are not analyzing a film's technical details. Instead, their ratings are usually based on a more direct question: 'Was it enjoyable?' Audience scores, therefore, often reflect a film’s entertainment value and emotional impact. In places like Vietnam, the 'word-of-mouth' effect on social media and high ratings on booking apps can turn a film into a massive hit, regardless of what critics think. These scores are democratic; they show what the majority of viewers found fun and engaging.

So, why is there often a significant gap between what critics and audiences think? The primary cause is the difference in evaluation criteria. A critic might praise a slow-paced, thought-provoking drama for its powerful message, but audiences might find it boring and give it a low score. Conversely, a simple action movie full of exciting explosions might be a huge hit with audiences, while critics may dismiss it as unoriginal and lacking substance. Neither side is necessarily 'wrong'; they are simply judging the film from completely different perspectives.

Ultimately, deciding who to trust depends on what you are looking for in a movie. If you want to understand a film's artistic value and appreciate the craft behind it, critics' reviews are an invaluable resource. If you just want to know if a movie is a fun way to spend a couple of hours, audience scores might be a more reliable guide. Perhaps the best approach is a balanced one: use both. Reading a critic's review can prepare you for the 'what' and 'why' of a film's quality, while checking the audience score can tell you if it aligns with popular taste. This way, you can make a truly informed decision.