Đề Tiếng Anh ôn thi tốt nghiệp THPT năm 2025- Mã đề thi THPT-44

Con Dao, an archipelago off the southern coast of Vietnam, is an island paradise with a turbulent past. (18) __________, the islands bear witness to a somber history. (19) __________, their stories echoing within the walls of infamous prisons like Phu Hai and Hang Duong. Today, these prisons stand as museums, offering a chilling glimpse into the island's past and serving as a solemn reminder of the human cost of conflict.

Yet, Con Dao is far from defined by its history. (20) __________ the archipelago is now a beacon of natural beauty and tranquility. Lush rainforests teeming with endemic flora and fauna blanket the islands, their emerald slopes plunging into turquoise waters. Divers and snorkelers are greeted by vibrant coral reefs, while pristine beaches offer respite for sun-seekers and serenity for those seeking solace. The transformation of Con Dao stands as a testament to the resilience of nature and the enduring human spirit.

The largest of the archipelago's 16 islands, Con Dao Island, is home to the majority of the population and the main hub for tourism. Here, visitors can explore remnants of the island's colonial past, from the French-built lighthouse (21) __________ to the grand villas that once housed prison officials. A visit to the Con Dao National Park offers a chance to witness the island's incredible biodiversity, including endangered species like the critically endangered Hawksbill sea turtle, which nests on the island's shores.

(22) __________. It is a destination that challenges and captivates, offering visitors a chance to reflect on the past while embracing the promise of the present.

The global arms trade is undeniably vast. Countries around the world, from the United States and Russia to China and Germany, engage in the buying and selling of military equipment, ranging from small arms and ammunition to sophisticated fighter jets and warships. The value of this trade is staggering, reaching hundreds of billions of dollars annually. For example, in 2022 alone, global military expenditure surpassed $2.24 trillion, a testament to the scale and reach of the arms market.

This trade, however, is not without its controversies. Critics argue that the proliferation of weapons, particularly in volatile regions, fuels conflict and instability. They point to examples like the ongoing civil war in Yemen, where weapons supplied by major arms exporters have exacerbated the humanitarian crisis. Additionally, concerns about human rights abuses committed with these weapons, such as the use of certain types of munitions against civilian populations, continue to plague the industry.

Proponents of the arms trade argue that it serves legitimate security interests, allowing nations to defend themselves against potential threats. They maintain that responsible arms sales, guided by strict regulations and end-user agreements, can actually contribute to regional stability by deterring aggression. Moreover, the economic benefits of the arms industry, including job creation and technological advancement, are often cited as justifications for its continued existence.

Despite these arguments, the ethical implications of the global arms trade remain complex. Balancing the economic and security interests of nations with the need to protect human rights and prevent conflict presents a persistent challenge for the international community. As technology advances and the nature of warfare evolves, the debate surrounding the arms trade is likely to intensify, demanding thoughtful consideration and responsible action from all stakeholders.

[I] Social media has undeniably revolutionized communication in the 21st century, fundamentally altering how we interact with each other and consume information. [II] This ease of connection has allowed individuals to reach out to long-lost friends, maintain relationships with family members living abroad, and even build professional networks, all with a few taps on a screen. [III] While these advancements offer incredible potential, it is crucial to consider both the positive and negative impacts of this digital shift. [IV]

One key consequence of social media's rise is the changing nature of news dissemination. Traditional news outlets, such as newspapers and television broadcasts, are no longer the sole gatekeepers of information. Instead, news spreads rapidly through social media platforms, often shared by individuals and citizen journalists. This democratization of information can be empowering, giving a voice to marginalized communities and allowing for the rapid dissemination of critical information during emergencies. However, this same speed and accessibility can also contribute to the spread of misinformation, making it difficult to distinguish fact from fiction in the constantly updating digital landscape.

The constant connectivity offered by social media also presents a double-edged sword. While it allows for real-time updates and constant communication, it can also lead to feelings of social pressure and anxiety. The curated nature of online profiles can create unrealistic expectations and contribute to social comparison, impacting self-esteem and mental well-being. Furthermore, the addictive nature of these platforms can lead to excessive screen time, potentially detracting from real-life interactions and contributing to feelings of isolation despite constant digital connection.

In conclusion, the impact of social media on communication is complex and multifaceted. While it has undoubtedly fostered global connections and democratized information sharing, it also presents challenges related to misinformation, mental well-being, and the changing nature of social interaction. Understanding both the benefits and drawbacks of this ever-evolving digital landscape is crucial for navigating the complexities of communication in the 21st century and harnessing its potential for positive change.